September 19, 2006
-
on "national apologies" and "cultural apologies"
This is an interesting quote from Jonah Goldberg. What do you all think of it?
... related is the fascinating (and quite prevalent) "historical burden of guilt" argument... "Your ancestors did ___ and so you have no right to say ____. So sit down and shut up." The question of where "moral authority" comes from is of extreme importance for our reeling postmodern generation.
(Hint... it comes from the Bible...)
Comments (5)
i miss you, and i'm sorry i haven't called. maybe this weekend?
Thanks for your comment. I responded.
hmmm. would that be for them to be 'used' within the inner circle? or used by and for those outside? (not that there really is an 'outside'...) i wonder
you're welcome!!
A quite convenient argument. If moral authority is relative, we can find a reason to dismiss anyone's position because they aren't perfect. One reason no one wants to admit the possibility of a perfect creator God. While no one is perfect we can all claim to be equally imperfect (although we like to accuse certain people - Hitler, Stalin are popular - of being more imperfect) which means we all have an equal amount of perfection - none. However, as soon as you introduce a perfect entity my imperfection looks like just that. Ugly stuff.
Hey Tim, it has been a while! I think I will browse your site a bit!!!
Mark Kirby
Comments are closed.