atheism

  • Templeton

    “But, Billy, it’s simply not possible any longer to believe, for instance, the biblical account of creation. The world wasn’t created over a period of days a few thousand years ago; it has evolved over millions of years. It’s not a matter of speculation; it’s demonstrable fact.” -- Charles Templeton

    Billy Graham and Charles Templeton were two of the most famous 20th century evangelists. Templeton eventually lost his faith and became an atheist... why? He couldn't find answers to his historical/scientific doubts about Genesis and creation. This shows the importance of knowing the reasons to believe that Genesis is literal history... apologetics is not a 'side issue' for many of us... it is crucial for both ourselves, and our friends. https://creation.com/billy-grahamhttps://isgenesishistory.com/

  • Atheist morality

    This link raises good questions (in a satirical / humorous way) about whether atheists have any foundation for objective morality...

    http://babylonbee.com/news/atheist-carries-random-act-socially-programmed-altruism-survival-herd/

     

  • "Pastor, am I a Christian?"

    Nicholas Kristof interviews Tim Keller.  http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/23/opinion/sunday/pastor-am-i-a-christian.html
    Interesting questions and answers!

  • "A survivor of Bible-belt America..."

    Here is a fascinating article about Russell Moore, and why people are criticizing him, but why his Christ-before-politics approach is so powerful, right, and needed.
    He calls himself “a survivor of Bible Belt America”... I know exactly what he means, being a “survivor” also myself. May God raise up many more survivors like him.
  • honesty

    "Christianity put too tight a moral rein on my life. I am a naturally selfish and sometimes devious person, and quite frankly I didn't want to be bound by a world-view which insisted that I should be altruistic and honest."

    -- fascinating quote by a very honest, anonymous, atheist...

    http://www.christianthinktank.com/tqdecide.html

  • Book Reviews - 2015'ish

    (Visit this link for all my book reviews http://tim223.xanga.com/category/book-reviews/ )

    Why God Calls Us To Dangerous Places, by Kate McCord
    This is a beautiful, thought-provoking book, interwoven with stories from her experiences of 9 years in Afghanistan.  Why do we go (or support those who go)?  Primarily, because God loves those people, and His love begins to transform us so that we begin to love them too.  She has great insights about loss, PTSD, ministry burnout, etc... great insights on how to rest in God and be at peace when all around you comes crashing down, when your friends die (or are murdered), when you are threatened, etc.  When terrorists plot to attack us and do attack us, may our heart be that described in this book.  So far opposite from "let's nuke them all", let our heart instead be, "Who will go to tell them about the love of Jesus?"  See also my previous review of her (excellent) book "In the Land of Blue Burqas".

    The 5 Love Languages, by Gary Chapman
    You've probably heard of this book, even if you haven't read it.  I finally got around to reading it.  I was afraid that it was going to be oversimplistic... but it was not.  His main point is that people experience 'feeling loved' in very different ways (words of affirmation, acts of service, receiving gifts, quality time, and physical touch), and that husbands and wives need to learn how to speak the other's love language.  He explains how he 'discovered' each one by various conversations with his clients (he is a professional counselor).  He includes lots of stories, including about those whose marriages were falling apart.  He is a Christian, but keeps most of the book 'generic' and secular... until the last chapter or so, when he explains about Christ's love.  Excellent, worth reading, overall.

    The Secret Thoughts of an Unlikely Convert, by Rosaria Champagne Butterfield
    This is the true story of how a very liberal and atheistic woman found Christ.  She explains her journey into identifying as a lesbian, and her journey to become an English professor at Syracuse University, teaching Gay and Lesbian Studies.  She happened to become connected with a caring Christian, who took the time to invite her to dialog regularly about matters of faith over dinner with himself and his wife.  Through this friendship, she reevaluated Christ and the Bible, and eventually came to believe in Christ.  This began to massively change her lifestyle, as she chronicles.  Later in her life, she became married, became an adoptive/foster mom, and homeschooled her children.  This is a beautiful, well-written, testimony... well worth reading.

    The Verbally Abusive Relationship, by Patricia Evans
    This book discusses relationships (primarily husband-wife) where one person (typically, but not always, the husband) verbally abuses the other person.  Most of the book is focused on description (and true stories).  She categories all people as holding to either a "Power-over" mindset or a "Personal power" mindset, which is rather simplistic, but there is some value in the distinction.  (The "Power-over" mindset perfectly describe the consequences of the Fall that the Bible discusses in Genesis 3:16.)  Chapter 11 and 12 have some great, helpful, advice on how to respond to abuse in a way that will hopefully cause the abuser to notice the problem and begin to change.  Basically, 'set limits'/'boundaries' in your own mind before the abuse happens (for example, 'I will not allow him to yell at me', or 'I will not allow him to demean me'), and then if it happens, respond forcefully 'Cut it out', or 'I will not accept that sort of speech', or, walk away.  In cases of physical abuse, of course, flee.  Chapter 13 on recovery is also good.  Convicting for all to read, and helpful if (/when) we have friends going through this type of marital stress, to be able to provide support and counsel.  Worth reading (or at least skimming, chapters 1, 11, 12, 13).  However, sadly, it is completely secular... so unable to discuss the powerful wisdom from Ephesians, etc.  Eggerichs' "Love and Respect" is more helpful in this area, and also even "For Men Only"/"For Women Only" by the Feldhahns (even though the latter mostly restrains itself to secular points).

    And the Word Came With Power, by Joanne Shetler and Patricia Purvis
    Powerful true story(ies) of how the Bible was translated for the Balangao people in the Philippines.  She shares many stories from her life there.  Especially powerful were all the times when God brought about events that she thought were catastrophic, but actually turned out for the best.  She prayed for the salvation of her host family for a LONG time, and nothing happened.  But eventually, they became believers in Jesus, and became powerful proponents of the gospel.  Also fascinating to hear about the confrontations between the evil spirits and the Spirit of God in the Christians.  Highly recommended book.

    The Post-Church Christian: dealing with the generational baggage of our faith, by J. Paul Nyquist and Carson Nyquist
    This book very well exposes and airs the reactionary complaints that millenials have against the 'institutionalized', 'tradition-bound', 'organized-religion', 'overprotective', 'cultural-christianity', 'anti-homosexual', 'judgmental', 'overly-political', 'hypocritical', Church (as they consider it).
    Unfortunately, the response that J.Paul Nyquist tries to give to his son is rather weak.  He basically says 'try to be understanding to us (the older Christians), give us the benefit of the doubt, cut us some slack, understand our historical context'.  But our response should be to go back to Jesus, that iconoclastic, 'have you never read the scriptures' Man.
    Typical paragraph from the book: "Thirty years ago, the American evangelical church member would never dream of being caught in a bar. Today, churches are being planted there. Amid the social environment found in pubs, we see opportunities to express the hope of Christ to those who enjoy a pint as they talk about life."
    Their main takeaway points: don't give up on the church.  Increase authenticity, yes, sure, fine.  Remove excessive linkages between "God and country", sure.  Remove unbiblical legalism, yes by all means.  But don't throw out the Church - it has an important God-given function.   With this point, I agree.

    You and Me Forever, by Francis and Lisa Chan
    The Chans discuss marriage in this book, but first, they discuss putting Jesus at the center and top priority of one's life.  That is their main point... to stop focusing so much on marriage or singleness, and focus more on the kingdom of God in whatever station of life.  Since they are themselves married, it comes across as slightly tone-deaf to the struggles singles have, however, their bracing 'focus on Jesus'/'put His kingdom first' message is important and needed and overall Biblical.  They make much of Paul's instructions in 1 Cor. 7, and other passages.  They also generally live out what they preach, enhancing their message's impact.  Good book, a little strident at times, but worth reading and pondering.

    Seven Marks of a New Testament Church, by David Alan Black
    Excellent short book (only 50 pages).  He talks about these "7 marks"- Evangelistic preaching, Christian baptism, apostolic teaching, genuine relationships, Christ-centered gatherings, fervent prayer, sacrificial living, based on Acts 2.

    Tactics, by Gregory Koukl
    Excellent book.  When people hear of 'tactics' in the context of apologetics, most millenials are turned off because they assume it's about manipulation and argumentation, which they want to avoid.  Instead, Koukl presents ways of using questions to turn around conversations that start out with someone asking you a hostile question related to your faith, so that you can expose the deeper beliefs underlying the question, and move into a respectful, healthy, dialog.  This book is worth reading over and over, and practicing its contents, not for the purpose of manipulation, but for the sake of truly loving our neighbors, and helping them find out the awesome truth about Jesus.

    From Heaven He Came and Sought Her
    This book is a collection of essays about Particular Atonement ("Limited Atonement").  It thoroughly covers the historical views of the Church in the past centuries, and then gets into the Scriptural/theological discussion.  It's a tough, slow, closely-reasoned read, but worth slogging through.

    The Genesis Account, by Jonathan Safarti
    This is a scientific and theological commentary on Genesis 1-11.  It is a very thorough, even, solid, well-documented, well-reasoned, and objective commentary.  As a reference book, it's not for light reading (some of Sarfati's other books like "Refuting Evolution" or "Refuting Compromise" are easier to read), but it's well worth slowly reading.  It covers all the major scientific evidences for/against various age theories of the earth and evolution, and all the current and past hermeneutical interpretations of Genesis 1-11.  Excellent.

    Cold Case Christianity, A Homicide Detective Investigates The Claims of the Gospels, by J. Warner Wallace
    This is an awesome book.  It focuses on whether the gospel accounts (Matthew, Mark, Luke, John) about Jesus are accurate or not.  The author was an atheist until his thirties, and a homicide detective who specialized in solving cold cases (unsolved crimes from decades past).  When he began to investigate the gospel accounts, he realized that they have all the marks of true eyewitness accounts.  This book covers the same historical facts as many other apologetics books (Josh McDowell, etc), but is extremely well-written, and with a fresh perspective.

    Debating Darwin's Doubt, edited by David Klinghoffer
    This book is basically a collection of online articles written as back-and-forth debate followup to Steven Meyer's "Darwin's Doubt".  It discusses the major objections of all the critics, and offers rebuttal.  It is a little hard to read, and a little repetitive, but overall a good, very solid and thorough, rebuttal of the critics' arguments and confirmation that Meyer's basic point was correct: the sudden appearance of Cambrian animals in the fossil layer cannot be explained through Darwinian/neoDarwinian evolution, nor through any other non-intelligent materialistic causes.  An Intelligent Designer is the proper inference to the Cambrian fossil record.

  • Gravitational Waves, and Big Bang Theory...

    Most secular scientists believe in the (naturalistic) Big Bang theory (BBT) of the origin of the universe. However, this theory has huge scientific problems.

    This weekend I watched "Our Created Universe", DVD 3 of this series http://www.creationastronomy.com/store/  . I highly recommend it. Its production is rather low-budget, and it is aimed at the scientific layman, but the information it presents is accurate, thorough, and even humorous in its exposing of the vacuity of the BBT.

    Producer Spike Psarris explains the BBT, and also the reasons why scientists keep trying to desperately patch it up, with unobserved/unobservable entities like "inflation", "dark matter", "dark energy", and "multiverses". He shows how the BBT is very unscientific, in that it contradicts known science such as the conservation of matter/energy, it postulates unobservable entities and 'miracles', and sweeps away the philosophical foundation of science: the assumption of an orderly, cause-and-effect universe. He includes a hilarious (and well-documented) discussion of "Boltzmann Brains", another aspect of the self-refuting nature of the BBT. He concludes with a brief explanation and celebration of the main alternative theory - the Genesis 1 story, that God created the heavens. He did not get into the starlight-time-travel problem in this DVD but said it would come in his next DVD. (There are good articles explaining this at creation.com and elsewhere, via time-dilation or space-stretching hypotheses.)

    He nicely distinguishes the scientific, measureable facts observed in the skies (redshifts, blueshifts, spectral signatures, gravity waves, etc) from the interpretations people make about those facts. Last week's announcement about LIGO's discovery of gravitational waves is an example of real science (measureable, testable, repeatable), in contrast to the practically-unfalsifiable continually-patched-up LCDM BBT.

    It's worth buying a copy of the DVD and watching it... Let me know if you'd like to borrow a copy from me...

  • Biological information

    This fun new 20-minute video from the Discovery Institute illustrates the question of "where did the information inside living cells come from?"   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aA-FcnLsF1g

    If even ONE single stable protein of practical biological length could not have formed by chance processes during the history of life on earth, much less a biologically functional protein, much less the hundreds of proteins necessary for new functional types of cells and new body plans, why do evolutionists keep insisting that all biological information was formed this way?

    (Not even to mention the improbability of getting the first living cell from nonliving chemicals, and problems like Haldane’s dilemma of how to spread genes throughout the population within the short time of the Cambrian Explosion and Sanford’s dilemma of how to prevent genetic entropy from overwhelming beneficial mutations with harmful ones)...

    (Not to mention, in a naturalistic scenario, why would one hold to the unscientific view that matter/energy appeared out of nothing, thus breaking all the laws of thermodynamics and scientific method causality?)

    The failure of naturalistic theories like neodarwinian evolution to explain the origin of the  information built into living cells has long pointed instead to a Designer (and in my understanding, the best candidate is the God of the Bible, because there is actual evidence for His existence... such as the resurrection of Jesus from the dead...).

    http://pleaseconvinceme.com/2013/the-minimal-facts-of-the-resurrection/

    http://www.reasonsforgod.org/the-best-reasons/the-resurrection/

    http://worldviewofjesus.com/2013/02/03/minimal-facts-argument-for-the-resurrection-of-jesus-Christ/

  • afraid of death?

    Today I read this interesting article ( http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/national/2015/04/04/tech-titans-latest-project-defy-death/  ), about how lots of rich philanthropists are trying to invest in medical technologies to expand their lifespans to 150 years or so.

    It's a thought-provoking article, but it basically highlights the fact that most people are afraid of death.  In fact, most people try not to think about it.

    In contrast, those of us who know Jesus Christ and are aware of the evidence that He actually rose from the dead are able to be unafraid of death.  It's not that we are naturally more peace-filled people, but instead that we have heard the good news report (and believed it). We know that while death is indeed an enemy, it is only temporary for those of us who believe in Jesus Christ.  Soon we too will be resurrected to eternal life, never to die, and will live in happiness forever.  As the Bible says in Hebrews 2:14-15:

    "Therefore, since the children share in flesh and blood, He Himself likewise also partook of the same, that through death He might render powerless him who had the power of death, that is, the devil, and might free those who through fear of death were subject to slavery all their lives."

    Happy Resurrection Day!

  • More problems with the alleged evolutionary tree

    Here's a great article summarizing the fact that the morphological (fossil-based), DNA-genetic, RNA-genetic, mitochondrial-genetic, and microRNA-genetic similarity 'trees' simply don't match.  At all.  They completely contradict each other in thousands if not millions of places.

    http://www.evolutionnews.org/2015/02/problem_6_molec091151.html

    This is especially fascinating to me because a few years ago, I was listening to an evolutionist give a lecture.  After his lecture during the Q/A time, I asked him what was, in his opinion, the strongest evidence in favor of evolution.  He said, the fact that the fossil tree and molecular genetic tree match so nicely.

    Unfortunately for him, as the science continues to develop, it continues to sweep aside that piece of evidence upon which he relied.

    In contrast, the molecular and fossil evidence we see is for a set of "bushes" (both morphologically and genetically), not a single tree - perfectly matching what the Bible says about God creating each animal after its own "kind".  Genetic and morphological variation within each kind is thus expected (Chihuahua vs Great Dane), and significant similarity between DNA (because similar or identical proteins are being used), but not necessarily a genetic "tree" from a single common ancestor... because there was no common ancestor.

(I use 'tags' and 'categories' almost interchangeably... see below)

Recent Comments